Hi Everyone:
I would like to give you an update on how our discussion
went last Friday and give you a few pointers for the next assignment. Let’s start with our next meeting. Looks like the best time for our next meeting
would be Monday, August 24th,
9:00 A.M. in room 2209. This time we
will be discussing Jean Rhys’ Wide
Sargasso Sea, and the assignment for this book is the same as the past
three assignments (see blog). The final
assignment for the summer will be a bit more project-based, but I will let you
know all about that at our next meeting.
Wide Sargasso Sea is a very
intriguing book that deals with intersections of race, class, cultural
imperialism and complicated family connections.
As you are reading, try to resist dismissing the main character,
Antoinette, as simply “crazy.” In the
past, students have been tempted to describe the book as the story of someone
“going crazy,” but that’s hardly a meaningful assertion. Try to consider how the book is framing
Antoinette’s experiences and then analyze / make meaning out of her responses. She is not going to explain her responses to
you; you will have to look for patterns of behavior and make your own
conclusions.
Although there was low attendance at the last meeting, the
discussion of Invisible Man part two
went very well. I asked about general
impressions of the end, and many students commented on how Ellison really pushes
the limits of “reality” as the book goes on, culminating in moments like Ras
appearing on horseback with a spear, the Invisible Man literally (?) living in
a hole, and Brother Jack’s eyeball falling out.
To the great credit of the students at the meeting, some brought up the
most complicated and troubling parts of the book, namely the very uncomfortable
moments of sexuality. As we talked
through those moments, students generally thought that those moments were significant
because they tend to bring together all of the major tensions in the book: race
relations, power struggles, hidden desire, cultural masks, and the need to
establish an identity. We then talked
through some of the themes we brought up last time with certain questions in
mind. How does the novel deal with
identity and frame what “identity” is?
What is the novel revealing about systems of control and power in
American culture? Why does Ellison use
such heavy, almost cartoonish metaphors throughout the book? We also took a little time to analyze and
dissect two passages (Ellison’s description of the college and Ellison’s later
description of Clifton’s death) in order to gain insight into how carefully
Ellison structures even the short episodes of the novel. In a grand scale, we noted how Ellison
structures the novel with certain significant events, e.g. repeated speeches
which show development and repeated moments of “rebirth” or awakening for the
protagonist.
Finally, we started to ponder the question of where the book
leaves us. In a world of deception and
corruption, is it really a solution to hide away from it in a hole? But if we face it, do we do this at our own
peril?
Thanks for reading, and I look forward to seeing you next
time, Mr. Telles.
No comments:
Post a Comment